Visual and metafictional strategies for the reclamation of a legacy in 'Candyman' (Nia DaCosta, 2021)
Published 2022-07-01
Keywords
- <em>Candyman</em>,
- Legend,
- Memory,
- Legacy,
- Sequel
- Slasher,
- Horror,
- Metafiction. ...More
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 L'Atalante. Journal of film studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In 1992, Candyman (Bernard Rose) made history by featuring the first African American villain in a big slasher production. Nearly thirty years later, Jordan Peele and Nia DaCosta have brought back the killer with the hook to explore the current state of the fight against racism in the United States. This article explores the ways in which the new Candyman (Nia DaCosta, 2021) leverages its status as a sequel to examine the notions of legacy and memory inherent both in the Candyman legend and in the reclamation of the stories of victims of racist violence. It is argued that the film uses its place in the saga, the conventions of the slasher genre, and the visual mythology originally established by Rose to create an intricate metafictional game exploring the problems of confronting a traumatic past. Central to this discussion is the motif of the mirror, whose importance to the story is related to the numerous narrative and visual parallels between the two films, and to the call made to the audience to reflect on an uncomfortable reality that is given an enduring form through art.
Downloads
References
- Abbot, S. (2015). Candyman and Saw: Reimagining the Slasher Film through Urban Gothic. En W. Clayton (ed.), Style and Form in the Hollywood Slasher Film (pp. 67-78). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Adams, M. R. (2015). Roses Are Red, Violence Is Too: Exploring Stylistic Excess in Valentine. En W. Clayton (ed.), Style and Form in the Hollywood Slasher Film (pp. 92-105). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Briefel, A., Ngai, S. (1996). “How much did you pay for this place?” Fear, Entitlement, and Urban Space in Bernard Rose’s Candyman. Camera Obscura, 13[1(37)], 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-13-1_37-69
- Caprilozzi, C. (2012, 14 de diciembre). Twenty Year Retrospective of Candyman with Virginia Madsen. Horror News Network. Recuperado de http://www.horrornewsnetwork.net/twenty-year-retrospective-of-candyman-with-virginia-madsen/
- Clover, C. J. (1992). Men, Women, and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Collis, C. (2020, 27 de febrero). Candyman trailer looks to hook your attention. Entertainment Weekly. Recuperado de https://ew.com/movies/2020/02/27/candyman-trailer/
- Conrich, I. (2010). Introduction. En I. Conrich (ed.), Horror Zone (pp. 1-8). Nueva York: I. B. Tauris.
- Conrich, I. (2015). Puzzles, Contraptions and the Highly Elaborate Moment: The Inevitability of Death in the Grand Slasher Narratives of the Final Destination and Saw Series of Films. En W. Clayton (ed.), Style and Form in the Hollywood Slasher Film (pp. 106-117). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Danielson, L. (1979). Folklore and film: Some thoughts on Baughman Z500-599. Western Folklore, 38(3), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1499246
- Donaldson, L. F. (2011). “The suffering black male body and the threatened white female body”: ambiguous bodies in Candyman. Irish Journal of Gothic and Horror Studies, 9, 32-43. Recuperado de http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/36210/
- Falvey, E., Hickinbottom, J., Wroot, J. (2020). Horror 2020: Introducing New Blood. En E. Falvey, J. Hickinbottom, J. Wroot (eds.), New Blood: Critical Approaches to Contemporary Horror (pp. 1-11). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
- Halberstam, J. (1995). Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Hantke, S. (2010). Introduction. En S. Hantke (ed.), American Horror Film. The Genre at the Turn of the Millennium (pp. vii-xxxii). Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
- Kellner, D. (1996). Poltergeists, Gender, and Class in the Age of Reagan and Bush. En D. E. James, R. Berg (eds.), The Hidden Foundation: Cinema and the Question of Class (pp. 217-239). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Knöppler, C. (2017). The Monster Always Returns. American Horror Film and Their Remakes. Bielefeld: Transcript.
- Koven, M. J. (1999). Candyman Can: Film and Ostension. Contemporary Legend n.s., 2, 155-173.
- Kydd, E. (1996). Guess who else is coming to dinner: Racial/sexual Hysteria in Candyman. CineAction, 36, 63-72.
- Langston League (ed.) (2021). Candyman: The Official Companion Guide. Recuperado de https://dx35vtwkllhj9.cloudfront.net/universalstudios/candyman-social-impact/syllabus/Candyman_TheOfficialCompanionGuide_Final.pdf
- Leeder, M. (2018). Horror Film. A Critical Introduction. Nueva York: Bloomsbury.
- Lovell, G. (1992, 29 de octubre). Black Slasher “Candyman” Draws Fire Over “racist” Depictions. Chicago Tribune. Recuperado de https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1992-10-29-9204080203-story.html
- Petridis, S. (2019). Anatomy of the Slasher Film: A Theoretical Analysis. Jefferson: McFarland.
- Pisters, P. (2020). New Blood in Contemporary Cinema. Women Directors and the Poetics of Horror. Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
- Sobande, F. (2019). Dissecting Depictions of Black Masculinity in Get Out. En S. Holland, R. Shail, S. Gerrard (eds.), Gender and Contemporary Horror in Film (pp. 237-250). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
- Travis, B. (2020, 14 de abril). Candyman: Why Jordan Peele Chose Nia DaCosta As Director. Empire. Recuperado de https://www.empireonline.com/movies/news/candyman-jordan-peele-chose-nia-dacosta-director-exclusive-image/
- Wester, M. L. (2012). African American Gothic: Screams from Shadowed Places. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Wood, R. (1979). An introduction to the American Horror Film. En R. Wood y R Lippe (eds.), The American nightmare (pp. 7-28). Toronto: Festival of Festivals.
- Wyrick, L. (Autumn 1998). Summoning Candyman: The Cultural Production of History. Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, 54(3), 89-117. https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.1998.0003