Issue 19
Notebook

The Three Bodies of Narration: A Cognitivist Poetics of the Actor’s Performance.

Héctor Julio Pérez López
Universitat Politècnica de València
Bio

Published 2015-01-01

Keywords

  • Acting,
  • narration,
  • emotions,
  • cognitivism,
  • engagement,
  • likeability,
  • body,
  • aesthetics.
  • ...More
    Less

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to take a cognitivist approach to achieve an adequate understanding of the actor’s performance as a narrative an aesthetic factor. By way of introduction, a context is offered that explains what the actor’s performance has nearly always been considered in audiovisual works and previously in theatre, as something separate from the narration, a category reserved for diegesis. This is followed by a presentation of the general cognitivist conception as the most suitable approach to achieve this purpose, based on the central features of the concept of recognition, from which arises the central proposal of viewing actors as generators of the spectator’s attention, which is the first necessary condition for any story. The central part of the article is concerned with presenting the three main modes in which the actor’s presence arouses the spectator’s attention, elucidated with examples and an explanation of their narrative scope in each case. First, the value of the body in eliciting the neutral attention of the spectator to the character; secondly, the value of the exceptionality of the body in pertinent increments of spectator interest, which give rise to the emotions that are central to cognitivism, such as sympathy and empathy, which are thus determining factors in narrative processes; and finally, the article takes up one of the main debates in the field to offer an alternative to cognitivism and the main outcome of this research: acting, in its artistic sense, generates attention and emotions comparable with the most widely debated moral factors, such as allegiance. It is thus valid to consider that the actor’s performance as an artistic practice is the element with the greatest narrative depth insofar as it constitutes the stablest basis for the spectator’s attention.

References

<p>Balázs, Béla (1970). <em>Theory of Film: Character and Growth of a New Art</em>. Nueva York: Dover Publications.<br>
— (2010). <em>Early Film Theory: Visible Man and the Spirit of Film</em>. Nueva York/Oxford: Berghahn.<br>
Brown, William (2012). Is Acting a Form of Simulation or Being? Acting and Mirror Neurons. En A. Taylor (ed.), <em>Theorizing Film Acting</em> (107-119). Londres/Nueva York: Taylor &amp; Francis.<br>
Blanchet, Robert y Bruun Vaage, Margrethe (2012). Don, Peggy and Other Fictional Friends? Engaging With Characters in Television Series, <em>Projections, </em>6:2, 18-41.<br>
Bruun Vaage, Margrethe (2014). Blinded by Familiarity: Partiality, Morality and Engagement in Television Series. En T. Nannicelli<br>
y P. Taberham (eds.), <em>Cognitive Media Theory</em>  (268-85). Nueva York: Routledge.<br>
Chatman, Seymour Benjamin (1990). <em>Coming to Terms: The Rethoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film</em>. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.&nbsp;<br>
Decety, Jean y Jackson, Philip L. (2006). A Social-Neuroscience Perspective on Empathy. <em>Current Directions in Psychological Science</em>, 15 (2), 54-58.<br>
Dietrichs, Helmut H. (2004). <em>Geschichte der Film-theorie. Kunsttheoretische Texte von Méliès bis Arnheim</em>. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.<br>
Fahlenbrach, Kathrin (2010). <em>Audiovisuelle Meta-phern. Zur Körper- und Affektästhetik in Film und Fernsehen</em>. Marburg: Schüren.<br>
Fischer-Lichte, Erika (2004). <em>Aesthetik des Performativen.</em> Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.<br>
Fludernik, Monika (2008). Narrative and Drama. En J. Pier y J. A. García Landa (eds.), <em>Theorizing<br>
 Narrativity (Narratologia, 12)</em> (355-83). Berlín/Nueva York: Walter de Gruyter.<br>
Eaton, A. W. (2012). Robust Inmoralism. <em>Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism</em>, 70 (3), 281-292.<br>
Fontenille, Jacques (2004). <em>Soma &amp; Sema. <br>
Figures du corps</em>. París: Maisonneuve &amp; <br>
Larose.<br>
Gallese, Vittorio; Guerra, Michele (2012). Embodying Movies: Embodied Simulation and Film Studies. <em>Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image</em>, 3: 183-210.<br>
— (2013). Film, corpo, cervello: prospettive <br>
naturalistiche per la teoria del film. <em>Fata Morgana, </em>20<em>,</em> 77-91.<br>
Gaudreault, André; Jost, François (1990). <em>Le <br>
récit cinématographique.</em> París: Nathan. <br>
Goldie, Peter; Coplan, Amy (2011). <em>Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspec-tives.</em> Oxford: OUP.<br>
Guerra, Michele (2014). «Action, action, <br>
ACTION!»: la teoria americana degli anni Dieci. <em>Fata Morgana</em>, 23, 27-35.<br>
Hamilton, James (2007). <em>The Art of Theater.</em> Oxford: Blackwell.&nbsp;<br>
Herman, David (2004). Toward a Transmedial Narratology. En M. L. Ryan (ed.), <em>Narrative across Media. The Languages of Storytelling</em>. Lincoln/Londres: University of Nebraska Press.<br>
Jahn, Manfred (2001). Narrative Voice and Agency in Drama: Aspects of a Narratology of Drama. <em>New Literary History,</em> 32.3, 659–79.&nbsp;<br>
Knudsen, Eric I. (2007). Fundamental Components of Attention. <em>Annual Review of Neuroscience,</em> 30 (1), 57–78.<br>
Metz, Christian (1982). <em>The Imaginary Signifier</em>. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.<br>
Mittel,&nbsp;Jason (2012-13). <em>Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling, pre-publication edition. MediaCommons Press</em>. Recuperado de  &lt;http://mcpress.media-commons.<br>
org/complextelevision/character/&gt;<br>
Nünning, Ansgar; Sommer, Roy (2008). Diegetic and Mimetic Narrativity: Some Further Steps towards a Narratology of Drama, En J. Pier Y J. A. García Landa (eds.), <em>Theorizing Narrativity (Narratologia, 12)</em> (pp. 329-52). Berlín/Nueva York: Walter de Gruyter. <br>
Plantinga, Carl (1999). The Scene of Empathy and the Human Face. En C. Plantinga y G. M. Smith (eds.), <em>Passionate Views. Film, <br>
Cognition and Emotion</em> (239-56). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.<br>
— (2009). <em>Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator&rsquo;s Experience.</em> Berkeley: University of California Press.<br>
Richardson, Brian (2007). Drama and Narrative. En <em>The Cambridge Companion to Narrative</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br>
Smith, Murray (1995). <em>Engaging Characters. Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema.</em> Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br>
— (2005). Wer hat Angst vor Charles Darwin? Die Filmkunst im Zeitalter der Evolution. En M. Brütsch et allii (ed.), <em>Emotionalität und Film</em> (pp. 289–312). Marburg: Schüren.<br>
— (2011). Just What Is It That Makes Tony Soprano Such an Appealing, Attractive Murderer? En W. E. Jones, S. Vice (eds.), <em>Ethics at the Cinema</em> (pp. 66-90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br>
— (2011). Empathy, Expansionism and the Extended Mind. En P. Goldie y A. Coplan (eds.), <em>Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives</em> (pp. 99-117). Oxford: OUP.<br>
Sobchack, Viviane (2012). Being on the Screen: A Phenomenology of Cinematic Flesh, or the Actor&rsquo;s Four Bodies. En J. Sternagel, D. Levitt y D. Mersch (eds.), <em>Acting and Performance in Moving Image Culture: Bodies, Screens, Renderings</em> (pp. 429-446). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.  &nbsp;<br>
Sternagel, Jörg (2012). «Look at Me!»: A Phenomenology of Heath Ledger in <em>The Dark Knight</em>. En A. Taylor (ed.), <em>Theorizing Film Acting</em> (pp. 93-106). Londres/Nueva York: Taylor &amp; Francis.</p>